APHC010240812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 12506/2025 Between: Yarramilli Srirama Krishna Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri K. Venkatesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Swapna Priya, learned Assistant Government Pleader, Social Welfare, for respondents 1 to 4. 2. The notice to respondents 5 and 6 is dispensed with, since no adverse order affecting their rights or interests is passed. 3. The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.4 and his subordinates in not allowing the petitioner to cultivate his lands over an extent of Ac.1-96 cents and Ac.16.53 cents in survey Nos.1/2 and 2 respectively, situated in Thimmapuram Village, Addateegala Mandal, Alluri Sitha Rama Raju District, as illegal and arbitrary. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the aforementioned land. Respondent No.4, at the behest of respondents 5 and 6, is not allowing the petitioner to cultivate the subject land. 5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare, produced a copy of the instructions furnished by respondent No.4 and submitted that respondent No.4 is not interfering with the subject land. 6. A perusal of the instructions disclose that in respect of the subject land, LTRP dispute is pending between the petitioner on one hand and respondent No.6 on the other hand. The petitioner, earlier, filed W.P.No.30402 of 2024 against the Principal Secretary, Home Department and six others and said writ petition is pending. Further, respondent No.6, the granddaughter of respondent No.5, filed W.P.No.30541 of 2024 to direct the respondents therein not to dispossess her from the subject land in dispute. The instructions further reveal that though the land is in the name of the petitioner, he is not in possession of the land and the unofficial respondents are in possession of the subject land. 7. Thus, as seen from the instructions and submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader, respondent No.4, Tahsildar is not interfering with subject land. 8. This Court is not recording any finding in this writ petition, as to whether the petitioner or the unofficial respondents are in possession of the land. 9. Given the instructions furnished by respondent No.4, since the prayer in the writ petition is interference of respondent No.4 in the aforementioned lands and respondent No.4 is not interfering with the lands, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side directing respondent No.4 not to interfere with the subject land, without following due process of law. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Date : 08.05.2025 IKN 177 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 12506/2025 Date : 08.05.2025 IKN