Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176004 (ALL)

DEEPANSHU @ SHANU GAUTAM @ DIPANSHU KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/7913/2025 · 2025-11-04

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7913 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.155 of 2025, under Sections 64(1), 351(2), 318(4), 115(2) of BNS; Section 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act, Police Station Asiwan, District Unnao. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that that the informant aged about 18 years was lured by the applicant in love trap through instagram and subsequently, after making forged documents of marriage, physical relations were formed. In the statement under Section 180 also, the victim stated that the marriage was performed on the basis of false certificate and thereafter, physical relations were formed. The tentative age of the victim is around 18 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the marriage of the victim was solemnized and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 29.05.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed . Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Prabhu Sharan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepanshu @ Shanu Gautam @ Dipanshu Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Deepanshu @ Shanu Gautam @ Dipanshu Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 4, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 7913 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench