Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17599 (AP)

BURGAPU RAJESWARA RAO v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/12554/2025 · 2025-05-14

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ir h IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Vi*;/; r • * J - ^ THURSDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE /V ■ iS O! PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 12554 OF 2025 Between: Burgapu Rajeswara Rao, S/o Kumaraswamy, Aged about 44 M. Avalingi Village, Hira Mandal, Srikakulam District. years, R/o ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Hoi^ Deportment, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Srikal^ilam, Srikakulam District. 3. The Station House Officer, SarvakotaP.S., Srikakulam District. ...RESPONDENTS^ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction nature of the writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3'^ respondent in not regis^ring the First Information Report on the petitioners report dated 09-04-2025 is illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 praying that in more Particularly one in the r and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequently direct the 3’’*^ respondent to register First Information Report on petitioners report dated 09-04-2025 and conduct investigation. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to register First Information Report on petitioners report dated 09-04-2025 and conduct investigation,Pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the PetitionerSRI HARINADH NIDAMANURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER 1 APHC010240532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 12554/2025 Between: Burgapu Rajeswara Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.HARINADH NIDAMANURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr.N.Harinadh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Therefore, the petition may be dismissed infructuous. as Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand assistantiregistrar section officer closed. //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home D^ortment,State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravati, Guntur District. f 2. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakullam, Srikakulam District. 3. The Station House Officer, Sarvakota P.S., Srikakulam District. 4. One CC to Sri Harinadh Nidarn^nuri Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies. MBT T \ HIGH COURT DATED.-15/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.12554 of 2025 * 16 MAY 2075 ? a^ . Current oecuon . ^ DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS