Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17598 (RAJ)

RAGHUVARSINGH S/O RAMRATAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5926/2025 · 2025-06-13

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23189] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5926/2025 Raghuvarsingh S/o Ramratan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Chaukhapura, Police Station Badi Sadar, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Public Prosecutor Mr. Asad Ul Haq Nooree for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V.J.) Order 13/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.28/2025, registered with the Police Station Badi Sadar, District Dholpur for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 125, 74, 78(2) & 79 of B.N.S. and under Sections 7/8 of POCSO Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2025 and Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. Counsel further submits that all the injuries of both the injured persons are simple in nature, therefore, the petitioner may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the complainant have opposed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:23189] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5926/2025] 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that though no bone injury has been pointed out in the X-Ray report of the injured Shivcharan however, in his CT Scan, skull fracture has been pointed out. 5. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the challan papers. 6. In the alleged incident, two persons have been found to be injured; one is Shivcharan and another is Shiv Singh. As per the Medico Legal Report, Shiv Singh sustained seven injuries which have been opined to be simple in nature. As per the Medico Legal Report of Shivcharan, he sustained six injuries, out of which, three have been opined to be simple in nature and three have been advised for X-Ray. The X-Ray was prepared on 28.01.2025 and no bone injury is said to have been found and the injuries which was advised for X-Ray have been found to be simple in nature. 7. It has been submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that during the CT Scan of the injured Shivcharan, a skull fracture was found. Once the X-Ray report which was prepared on 28.01.2025 states that there in no bone injury, skull fracture found at subsequent stage creates doubt. 8. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is [2025:RJ-JP:23189] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5926/2025] transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA), (V.J.),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA/Satyendra/122