IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9946 of 2025 Decided on: 20th June, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Satish Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr Sikandar Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Sikandar Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is serving as Drawing Master at GMS Ropi U/C GSSS Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. His case is that on completion of normal tenure at the aforesaid place, he represented to respondent No.2 on 01.06.2025 (Annexure P- 3) invoking Clause 5.4 of the Transfer Policy for his suitable adjustment, however, the same has not been considered by 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - the respondent/Competent Authority till date. 3. Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2/Competent Authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and as per applicable transfer policy within a period of three weeks from today. The decision so taken be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge June 20, 2025 R.Atal