Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175964 (ALL)

MATRULAL AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/11826/2025 · 2025-12-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11826 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Several disputed questions of fact have been raised in the present writ petition. It is to be further noted that a civil suit is pending between the petitioners and the private respondent. 3. In light of the same, we are of the view that the writ petition cannot be entertained by this Court. 4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach the appropriate court/ authority for redressal of their grievances. December 15, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hairdaya Narain Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Matrulal And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench