BALAPEDDI JAGADEESH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/5135/2025 · 2025-06-30
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17595 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17595 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
/ APHC010240472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5135 OF 2025 Between: Balapeddi Jagadeesh, S/o. Sekhar, aged about 26 years, Occ; Private Employee, R/o.
H. No. 1-118, Ragigunta Village, Mandal, Tirupati District. K.V.B. Puram ...Petitioner/Accused No.2 AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P, Amaravathi, Through SHO, K.V.B. Puram Police Station, Tirupati District. 2. J Venkatesh, S/o. late Kondaiah, Aged about 30 years, R/o. Perindesam Harijanawada Village, K.V.B. Puram Mandal, Tirupati District. Ph. No.939820183 ...Respondent No.2/ Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings against the petitioner in F.I.R. No. 101 of 2024 of K.V.B. Puram Police Station, Tirupati District. lA NO: 1 OF 202fi Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be.pleased to stay all further proceedings against the petitioner in F.I.R. of 2024 of K.V.B. Puram Police Station, Tirupati District. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Y.V.S.S. DHARANEESH, Advocate Counsel for Respondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Counsel for Respondent No.2: - The Court made the following order:
APHC010240472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY.THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5135/2025 Between:
1.BALAPEDDI JAGADEESH, S/0. SEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/0. H.
NO. 1-118, RAGIGUNTA VILLAGE, K.V.B. PURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATHI, THROUGH SHO, K.V.B. PURAM POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2.J VENKATESH, , S/0. LATE KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/0. PERINDESAM HARIJANAWADA VILLAGE, K.V.B. PURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. PH.
NO.939820183 ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to Quash the proceedings against the petitioner in F.I.R. No. 101 of 2024 of K.V.B. Puram Police Station, Tirupati District and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings against
\ \ 2 the petitioner in F.I.R. No. 101 of 2024 Tirupati District and pass jA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the Hioh Sounds of Criminai Petition,the the n»n ^ proceedings against rt^^iSi^^d^ «-on. Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.YVS S DHARANEESH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR of K.V.B. Puram Police Station pass
3 The Court made the following Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the notice issued by this Court has been served on the 2"^^ respondent and proof of service is filed to this extent. The same is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court while admitting the Criminal Petition
directed the police to complete the investigation, without taking any coercive steps against the petitioner. It is now submitted that the Criminal Petition may be closed by those directions. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant
2.
3. Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that he has no
4. objection for giving such directions. Considering the same, the Criminal Petition is
disposed of, directing the police to complete the investigation, in accordance with law, without taking any coercive steps against the petitioner. This would not preclude the Investigating Officer from filing final report/charge sheet. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
5.
6. stand closed.
Sd/-B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ' SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Station House Officer, K.V.B. Puram Police Station, Tirupati District.
2. One CC to Sri Y.V.S.S. Dharaneesh, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CC’s to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. [OUT]
4. Three CD Copies GPC srfifi
\ HIGH COURT DATED: 01/07/2025
ORDER CRLP NO. 5135 OF 2025 ^ 13 AUG 2025 yA^ ntSectioQXW CO O DISPOSING THIS CRLP