ABHISHEK KUMAR @ ABHISHEK KUMAR JAISWAL AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/8448/2025 · 2025-10-30
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175945 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175945 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8448 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.114224 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No.199 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Aliganj, District Lucknow, including the summoning order dated 25.11.2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Room No.28, Lucknow.
3. This Court on 26.09.2025 directed the applicants to bring a bank draft drawn in favour of opposite party no.2 to show their bona fide. However, counsel for the applicants submits that the order passed by this Court on 26.09.2025 is not complied with by the applicants. Opposite party no.2 is also not present. Accordingly, interim order granted on 26.09.2025 is vacated.
4. At this stage, counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merits. However, he submits that applicants will surrender before the trial court and apply for bail. He prays that the applicants may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (AIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinay Kumar, Sandeep Kumar Ojha, Shrikant Tripathi, Touqeer Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar Jaiswal And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
2022 SC 3386).
5. It is, therefore, directed that in case the applicants surrender before the Court below within three weeks from today and prefer bail application, the trial court will decide the said bail application, as expeditiously as possible, taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
6. For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
7. The application stands disposed of. October 30, 2025 Rao/- A482 No. 8448 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench