Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16739 of 2016 ====================================================== Ragho @ Radhe Yadav S/O Late Shree Gope @ Mishri Gope, resident of village- Sakuchidih Barabag, P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Rajgir, District- Nalanda.
3. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Madhyama Sinchai Priyojana, Jamui, District- Jamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha-SC19 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 04-08-2025 Heard Mr. Surendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of an appropriate writ/ writs/ Rule/ Order or direction for quashing the
order dated 7.06.2016 passed by respondent no.2 in Case No. 44/16-17 as contained in Annexure-4 whereby and whereunder the respondent no. 2 has rejected the raiyati claim under Thana no. 295, khata no. 3, Plot/ Khesra No. 102 an area 15 decimals which was acquired by State Government on
Patna High Court CWJC No.16739 of 2016(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2 the ground of non production of documentary evidence by petitioner in respect of possession without considering the rent receipts as well as Jamabandi running in his favour.
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the competent authority/Court for the redressal of the grievance.
4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U