Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175929 (MAD)

D. RUKUMANI v. THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER

WP/47646/2025 · 2025-12-11

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 47646 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 47646 of 2025 D. Rukumani Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Revenue Officer Office Of District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Namakkal. 2.K. Muthusamy 3.K. Thangavel Respondent(s) PRAYER directing the 1st Respondent to rectify the mistake in UDR entry of the A Register Maintained by the Department of Survey and Settlement of Lands, Tamil Nadu for the land in Survey No.172/10, totally measuring 0.20 Acre, Situated at Minnakkal Village, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District based on the petitioners representation dated 07.10.2025 within a reasonable time as fixed by this Honble Court For Petitioner(s): M/s. L. Ramanathan For Respondent(s): Mr R.P Murugan Raja, Govt Advocate For R1 ORDER This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the first respondent to rectify the mistake in UDR entry of the ‘A’ register maintained by the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47646 of 2025 department of survey and settlement of lands, Tamil Nadu for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation dated 07.10.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.Since the aforementioned representation of the petitioner has not been considered by the first respondent, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3.Since no adverse order is passed against the respondents 2 and 3, notice to the respondents 2 and 3 is dispensed with. 4.Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent. 5.No prejudice would be caused to the first respondent if the petitioner's representation dated 07.10.2025, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the respondents 2 and 3 as well as any other third party whom the first respondent deems fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 6.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47646 of 2025 7.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 07.10.2025 seeking for rectification of the mistake in UDR entry of the ‘A’ register maintained by the department of survey and settlement of lands, Tamil Nadu for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the respondents 2 and 3 as well as any other third party whom the first respondent deems fit to enquire within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 11-12-2025 vga https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47646 of 2025 To The District Revenue Officer Office Of District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Namakkal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47646 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga WP No. 47646 of 2025 11-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis