Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17592 (AP)

Ramachandra Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/12692/2024 · 2025-08-28

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

.1. t APHC010238742024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI {Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAp WRIT PETITION NO: 12692 OF 2024 Between: 1 Ramachandra Reddy, S/o. Munaswamy Reddy, Aged about 78 years, R/o. D.No.1-126, Bappareddlapalli Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District. Gopal Reddy, S/o. Ramachandra Reddy, Aged about 49 years, R/o. D.No.1-126, Bappareddlapalli Village, Ramakuppam Mandal Chittoor District. 2. ... Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Andhra Pradesh. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 3. The District Registrar, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer Kuppam Revenue Division, Chittoor District. 5. The Tahsildar, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District. 6. The Sub Registrar, Ramakuppam, Chittoor District. V, C.Ganajamma, W/o Munivenkataswami, Age 70 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post, Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chittoor District. 8. C.Mangamma D/o Munivenkataswami, R/o. BaipareddypalliVillage & Panchayath, Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka, Chittoor District. Chinamunivenkatappa S/o Late Sokkamuniswami Age 75 years R/o. Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal, Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Chandhramma W/o C. Munivekatappa, Age 50 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post, Ramakupam Mandal, Kuppam Taluka, Chitturu District. Amaramma W/o C. Gatlapp, age 50 years, R/o. Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath, Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal, Kuppam Taluka Chittoor District. C. Harish, S/o Late Gantlappa, Age 35 years, R/o. Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post, Ramakupam Mandal, Kuppam Taluka, Chitturu District. C. Sudha, W/o. Harish, Aged 27 years |^ftida-R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. Laxamma, W/o Late Srinivasulu, Aged 50 years, R/o. Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. C. Mohan, S/o. Late Srinivasulu, Aged 25 years, R/o. Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C.Lavanya W/o Mohan Age 25 years ,R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 16. C.Gantlappa S/o Late Srinivasulu Age 23 years R/o Baipareddypall i Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 17. C.Subbanna S/o Chokkamuniswami Age 70 years ,R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 18. C.Gangojamma W/o Subbanna Age 65 years ,R/o Baipareddypalli Village & PanchayathChalidiganapaliiPost Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 19. C.Sangappa S/o Subbanna Age 40 years ,R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 20. C.Rupamma W/o Chengappa Age 35 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 21. C. Rupesh S/o C.Chengappa age 21 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 22. 23. C.Harish S/o C.Chengappa age 19 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Nagamma W/o Late Venkataramappa Age 60 years R/o Baipareddypalli Viltage & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 24. C, Anad S/o Late Venkataranappa Age years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 25. 26. C.Swathi W/o Anad Age 30 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka , Chitturu District. 27. C, Jayyappa S/o Late Chokkamuniswami Age 60 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Laxamma W/o Jayyappa Age 60 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Ravi S/o Jayyappa Age 40 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Sujathamma W/o Ravi Age 36 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Ramesh S/o Ja^^appa Age 36 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Nagaveni W/o Ramesh Age 33 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Radhappa S/o Chokkamuniswami Age 63 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Munneyamma W/o Radhappa Age 60 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath ChalidiganapaliiPost Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Manjunad S/o Radhappa Age years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Manjamma W/o Manjunadh Age 34 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C.Suresh S/o Radhappa Age 36 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C.Valamma W/o Suresh Age 32 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. C. Gantalappa S/o Muniswami Age 60 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. C. Siddhamma W/o Gantalappa AGE 57 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 39. 40. C.Karthik S/o Gantalappa Age 22 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 41. C. Supriyya W/o Karthik Age 30 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Taluka Chitturu District. 42. C. Srikanth S/O Gantlappa age 25 years R/o Baipareddypalli Village & Panchayath Chalidiganapalii Post Ramakupam Mandal Kuppam Talukp,-' ... Respondents 43. Chitturu District Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the ■ circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action on my representation dt.08.0472024 and not initiating appropriate action on my representation as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, null and void and against to the principles of natural justice and contrary to the procedure established by law and in violation of Articles 19, 21 of the Constitution of the India Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the said circumstances of the case and in the interests of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider my representation dt.23.01.2024 and take necessary steps on my representation, pending Writ Petition.^ Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI NANI BABU ROBBA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7, 15,18,20,25,33,39, 41 & 42: SRI K. SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent Nos.8 to 14,16,17,19, 21 to 24, 34 to 38, 40 & 43: The Court made the following order: >> APHC010238742024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 12692 of 2024 [3330] Between: 1 RAMACHANDRA REDDY,, S/0. MUNASWAMY REDDY, BAPPAREDDLAPALLI VriLAGE, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 GOPAL REDDY S/0. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 BAPPAREDDLAPALLI VILLAGE, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/0. D.NO.1-126, YEARS, R/0. D.NO.1-126, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1 THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA VELAGAPUDI, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, PRADESH. AMARAVATI. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KUPPAM REVENUE 4. THE DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE SUB REGISTRAR, RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7 C GANAJAMMA, W/0 MUNIVENKATASWAMI, AGE 70 YEARS I VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI CHALIDIGANAPALII POST, i TALUKA CHITTOOR DISTRICT MANGAMMA, BAIPAREDDYPAILIVILLAGE CHALIDIGANAPALII 1 TALUKA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9 CHINAMUNIVENKATAPPA, S/O LATE SOKKAMUNISWAMI AGE 75 BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND R/0. MUNIVENKATASWAMI D/0 8. C PANCHAYATH, POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM AND R/0. YEARS HINDU PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 2 10.C CHANDHRAMMA, W/0 C. MUNIVEKATAPPA, AGE 50 YEARS R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALil POST, RAMAKUPAM MANDAL, KUPPAM TALUKA, CHITTURU DISTRICT. 11.AMARAMMA, W/0 C. GATLAPP, AGE 50 YEARS, HINDU, R/0. BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH, CHALIDIGANAPALil POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL, KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 12.C HARISH, S/0 LATE GANTLAPPA, AGE 35 YEARS, HINDU, R/0. BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALil POST, RAMAKUPAM MANDAL, KUPPAM TALUKA, CHITTURU DISTRICT. 13.C SUDHA, W/0. HARISH, AGED 27 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND CHALIDIGANAPALil POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 14.LAXAMMA, , W/0 LATE SRINIVASULU, AGED 50 YEARS, HINDU, R/0. BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALil POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 15.C MOHAN, S/0. LATE SRINIVASULU, AGED 25 YEARS, HINDU, R/0. BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALil POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 16.C LAVANYA, W/0 MOHAN AGE 25 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE CHALIDIGANAPALil POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 17.C GANTLAPPA, S/0 LATE SRINIVASULU AGE 23 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALil POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 18.C SUBBANNA, S/0 CHOKKAMUNISWAMI AGE 70 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALil POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 19.C GANGOJAMMA, W/0 SUBBANNA AGE 65 YEARS HINDU R/0 VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALil POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 20.C SANGAPPA, S/0 SUBBANNA AGE 40 YEARS HINDU R/0 VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALil POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. PANCHAYATH KUPPAM AND PANCHAYATH BAIPAREDDYPALLI BAIPAREDDYPALLI 3 V 21.C RUPAMMA, W/0 CHENGAPPA AGE 35 YEARS HINDU R/0 VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 22.C RUPESH, S/0 C.CHENGAPPA AGE 21 YEARS HINDU R/0 VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 23.C HARISH, S/0 C.CHENGAPPA AGE 19 YEARS HINDU R/0 VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 24.C NAGAMMA, W/0 LATE VENKATARAMAPPA AGE 60 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 25.C ANAD, S/0 LATE VENKATARANAPPA AGE YEARS HINDU R/0 VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 26. C SWATHI, W/0 ANAD AGE 30 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 27.C JAYYAPPA, S/0 LATE CHOKKAMUNISWAMI AGE 60 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 28.C LAXAMMA, W/0 JAYYAPPA AGE 60 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 29. C RAVI, S/0 JAYYAPPA AGE 40 YEARS HINDU RIO BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 30.C SUJATHAMMA, W70 RAVI AGE 36 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 31.C RAMESH, S/0 JAYYAPPA AGE 36 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. • BAIPAREDDYPALLI BAIPAREDDYPALLI BAIPAREDDYPALLI BAIPAREDDYPALLI PANCHAYATH VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH VILLAGE AND 32.C NAGAVENI, W/0 RAMESH AGE 33 YEARS BAIPAREDDYPALLI HINDU R/0 VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALLI POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 33.C RADHAPPA, S/0 CHOKKAMUNISWAMI AGE 63 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE CHALIDIGANAPALII POST TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 34. C MUNNEYAMMA, W/0 RADHAPPA AGE 60 YEARS HINDU R/O . BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND CHALIDIGANAPALII POST TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT 35. C MANJUNAD, ‘ BAIPAREDDYPALLI CHALIDIGANAPALLI POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 36.C MANJAMMA, W/0 MANJUNADH AGE 34 YEARS HINDU BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND CHALIDIGANAPALLI POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 37.C SURESH, S/0 RADHAPPA AGE 36 YEARS HINDU R/O VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALLI POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 38. C VALAMMA, W/0 SURESH AGE 32 YEARS HINDU R/O BAIPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 39.C GANTALAPPA, S/0 MUNISWAMI AGE 60 YEARS HINDU BAIPAREDDYPALLI AND PANCHAYATH RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM PANCHAYATH RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM S/0 RADHAPPA AGE YEARS HINDU I VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH KUPPAM R/O R/O PANCHAYATH ^ KUPPAM BAIPAREDDYPALLI R/O . PANCHAYATH ^ KUPPAM VILLAGE CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 40.C SIDDHAMMA, W/0 GANTALAPPA AGE 57 YEARS HINDU BAIPAREDDYPALLI CHALIDIGANAPALII POST TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 41.C KARTHIK, S/0 GANTALAPPA AGE 22 YEARS HINDU BAIPAREDDYPALLI CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. 42.C SUPRIYYA, W/0 KARTHIK AGE 30 YEARS VILLAGE AND R/O VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM R/O VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH KUPPAM HINDU R/O PANCHAYATH MANDAL KUPPAM BAIPAREDDYPALLI CHALIDIGANAPALII POST RAMAKUPAM TALUKA CHITTURU DISTRICT. AND 5 43.C SRIKANTH, S/0 GANTLAPPA AGE 25 YEARS HINDU R/0 BAIPAREDDYPALLI CHALIDIGANAPALII TALUKA CHITTURU VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH POST RAMAKUPAM MANDAL KUPPAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action on my representation dt.23- 01.2024 and not initiating appropriate action on my representation as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, null and void and against to the principles of natural justice and contrary to the procedure established by law and in violation of Articles 19, 21 of the Constitution of the India and consequently Honble Court deems fit and proper in the said circumstances of the case and in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitjoner(S): 1.NANI BABU ROBBA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.KSRINIVAS The Court made the following: 1 6 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri K.Srinivas, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.7, 15, 18, 20, 25, 33, 39, 41 and 42 and Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the official respondents. Pithily, this Writ Petition is filed on the grounds that representation dated 08.04.2025 made to the authorities, but it was not addressed. Therefore, it is urged that the respondents be directed to address the representations, as such direction would suffice in the circumstances of the case. 2. 3. In the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India vs P. Venkatesh reported in (2019) 15 SCC 613 held that: Dispose of the representation’ mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals. Such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated by calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute. 4. This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities, before directing "consideration" of a claim or representation should examine whether the claim or representation is with reference to a "live" issue or whether it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue. If it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue or dispute, the Court/tribunal 7 ■ should put an end to the reconsideration. matter and should not direct consideration or If the Court to Tribunal deciding to direct examining the merits, it should make it consideration" without itself I clear that such consideration will relating to limitation or delay and laches be without prejudice to any contention Even if the Court does not and effect." expressly say so, that would be the legal position 5. Disposal of proceedings by seemingly consideration of representation though of cases in overburdened more disservice than innocuous orders directing result in quick or easy disposal adjudicatory institutions, but such orders do service to the cause of justice. 6. However, the respondents representation, examine the are directed to consider the petitioners’ accordingly, petitioner. It goes without saying completed within six weeks from the date same thoroughly, issue orders and communicate the decision to the that the entire process will be the order is received. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be order as to costs. As a sequel thereto. Interlocutory Applications shall stand closed. no pending, if any. Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Secretary, Department Government of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. 2. The District Collector, Chittoor, 3. The District Registrar, Chittoor. 4. The Revenue Divisional District. 5. The Tahsildar, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District. Of Revenue, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudv Chittoor District. Chittoor District. Officer, Kuppam Revenue Division Chittoor f 6. The Sub -Registrar, Ramakuppam, Chiftoor District. 7. One CC to Sri Nani Babu Robba, Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to Sri K. Srinivas, Advocate [OPUC] a Two CCS to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 10. Two CD Copies. ^ ssb f 1» HIGH COURT DATED:29/08/2025 ORDER WP No. 12692 OF 2024 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS