Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175916 (ALL)

SANDEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY HOME AFFAIRS LKO. AND ANOTHER

/10012/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10012 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Mr. Pramod Kumar, Awanish Pandey, learned Advocates have filed their Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. Heard. The present application has been filed by the applicant(s) for the following main reliefs:- "(1) To issue a order or directions for quashing the Charge sheet submitted by the Police of P.S. Wazirganj Lucknow vide charge sheet no. 01 dated 5.5.2018 filed in Crime no.0075 of 2018 under section 506/507 I.P.C and section 67-(A) of Information and Technology Act registered at P.S. Wazirganj Lucknow as contained in annexure no.1 to the application. (ii) ii) To issue a order or directions for quashing proceedings of the criminal case no36366 of2018 under section 506/507 I.P.C and section 67- (A) of Information and Technology Act pending before the court of Special C.J.M. Custom Lucknow" Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings i.e. Crime no.0075 of 2018 (supra), shall appear before the concerned Court within six weeks' from today and file the compromise. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sandeep Kumar Rawat, Simran Parveen Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep Kumar And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Ministry Home Affairs Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) (iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two weeks' from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the Counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. November 28, 2025 Jyoti/- A482 No. 10012 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench