Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
203
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-4905-2025
Date of decision: 02.07.2025
VIRENDER
….PETITIONERS
Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: - Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG, Haryana.
SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR as under: FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station 97 01.06.2019 1-14-61 of Punjab Excise Act, 1914 Rozka Meo, Nuh.
2. It is, inter alia, contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance to the order passed by this Court on 29.01.2025, the petitioner has appeared before the learned trial Court and furnished the requisite bail bonds. In support of his contention, he has placed on record copy of order dated 07.02.2025 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nuh.
4. This aspect is not disputed by learned State counsel.
5. During the course of hearing on 29.01.2025 following order was passed: -
“Counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner got absented which resulted into cancellation of his bail. It is further submitted that the petitioner was unable to KANIKA 2025.07.02 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
203 CRM-M-4905-2025 2 appear before the Court concerned due to some unavoidable circumstances. Notice of motion. Mr. Arjun Lakhanpal, Addl.A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State and prays for time to seek necessary instructions. Needful be done by the next date of hearing. Now be listed on 02.07.2025. In the meantime, the petitioner is hereby directed to appear before the Court concerned within next 10 days and on his doing so, the petitioner is directed to be released on interim bail to its own satisfaction by the Court concerned subject to cost of Rs.50,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner with the Poor Patient Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh. The petitioner is to abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.”
6. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already appeared before the learned trial Court and furnished his requisite bail/surety bonds consequent to the order dated 29.01.2025, passed by this Court, the present petition is allowed and the interim bail granted vide order dated 29.01.2025 is hereby confirmed.
7. The petition stands disposed of.
(SANJIV BERRY)
JUDGE 02.07.2025 kanika i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2025.07.02 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment