Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17585 (AP)

Jetla Venkayamma v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/10733/2019 · 2025-09-21

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010240762019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10733/2019 Between: 1. JETLA VENKAYAMMA, W/O.LATE CHINNA KAMARAJU, AGE 60 YEARS, R/O. NELLIPUDI VILLAGE, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADDATEEGALA CIRCLE, ADDATEEGALA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GANGAVARAM POLICE STATION, GANGAVARAM (AGENCY) MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. JETLA KONDALA RAO KONDA, S/O.BAPIRAJU, R/O. NELLIPUDI VILLAGE, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. JETLA DURGAMMA, W/O.KONDALA RAO @ KONDA, R/O. NELLIPUDI VILLAGE, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent 2 and 3 in not registering the FIR in pursuance of the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 18-7-2019 against the respondent 4 and 5 as wholly illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to register the FIR in pursuance of the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 18-7-2019 in accordance with law in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to register the FIR in pursuance of the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 18-7-2019 in accordance with law in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10733 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri K.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 22.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10733 of 2019 Date: 22.09.2025 PSA