HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7134 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.3- Gaon Sabha has been accepted by Sri Mohan Singh. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2- Consolidation Officer, Milkipur, First, District Ayodhya to decide case No.288, computerize case No.202454042345040390 under Section 9 (A) (2) of U.P.C.H.Act, "Shanti Devi and others Vs. Jagannath and others", expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2- Consolidation Officer, Milkipur, First, District Ayodhya is directed to decide case No.288, computerize case No.202454042345040390 under Section 9 (A) (2) of U.P.C.H.Act, "Shanti Devi and others Vs. Jagannath and others", expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 11, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Nath Pandey, Phool Badan Singh, Rahul Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt.Shanti Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench