Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17582 (AP)

S.SOMANNA @ SOLOMON RAJ v. P.S. JYOTHI AND 3 OTHERS

CRLRC/2167/2011 · 2025-03-26

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010240682011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2167/2011 Between: S.Somanna@ Solomon Raj ...PETITIONER AND P.S. Jyothi and 3 other ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: B.Naga Jaya Chandra Reddy Counsel for the Respondent(S): Public Prosecutor (A.P) The Court made the following: No representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. As seen from the record, F.C.O.P.No.65 of 2010 and F.C.O.P.No.52 of 2011 are pending on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Kurnool. The respondent Nos.2 and 3 have become majors. As seen from e-Courts status M.C.No.7 of 2010 was disposed of on 27.06.2014. The revision case was filed by the husband/father against interim order passed in Crl.M.P.No.58 of 2010 in M.C.7 of 2010 granting maintenance to the unofficial respondents. 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.2167 of 2011 Dated 26.03.2025 3. In view of disposal of M.C.No.7 of 2010, the revision case filed for granting of interim maintenance would become infructuous. The petitioner is required to challenge the orders passed in the M.C.No.7 of 2010 before the appropriate authority, if so advised. 4. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as infructuous.There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 26.03.2025 KMS 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.2167 of 2011 Dated 26.03.2025 101 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2167/2011 26.03.2025 W KMS