VINOD KUMAR and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. and ANR.
/7572/2019 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175811 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175811 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7572 of 2019 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. List revised. The matter pertains to the year 2019. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this petition. Learned A.G.A. is present. From perusal of the record, in the present case, no interim/stay order is operating. It appears that the case has lost its relevance due to efflux of time and has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
November 28, 2025 Shukla Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Vijay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Vinod Kumar And Anr. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench