HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11802 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed today by Shri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents. 3. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "I. To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding opposite parties to re-allot a commercial shop in lieu of commercial shop No.21 situated in Tulsi Place, Commercial Centre, Nanda Kheda, Bulaki Adda, Lucknow. II. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case may also pass in favour of the petitioner. III. Allow the petition with costs." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out Annexure-4 to the petition, which is information given to him by the Officer In-charge of the property (Administration, Lucknow Development Authority) informing him that, in pursuance of the order passed in the case of Radhey Shyam Gupta vs. Lucknow Development Authority, Thru. Chairman, Lucknow & Ors., Writ Petition No.4553 (M/B) of 2002, disposed of by this Court on 13.10.2017, the shop number of the petitioner has been changed from Shop No.1/104 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Triloki Nath Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ratnesh Chandra Ghanshyam Sahu .....Petitioner(s) Lucknow Development Authority Lko. Thru. Its Chairman And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) (Shop No.1) to Shop No.21 in the same complex. 5. It is the case of the petitioner that Radhey Shyam Gupta had initially been allotted Shop No.1; his shop number was changed and he approached this Court in Writ Petition NO.4553 (M/B) of 2002. The petitioner was the person in whose favour the LDA had passed the order which was set aside by this Court on 13.10.2017. To compensate the petitioner, he had been allotted Plot No.21 by the Vice-Chairman on 12.03.2018 and information regarding the same was given to the petitioner on 18.04.2018. 6. Now the respondents are demolishing the complex in which such shop is situated. He is not being accommodated, whereas other tenants have been accommodated. The petitioner has made a representation on 16.08.2025 to the Vice-Chairman, LDA, which is pending. 7. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the Vice-Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority, to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 16.08.2025 with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order before him. December 4, 2025 Shubhankar WRIC No. 11802 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench