Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175777 (ALL)

TARA DEVI @ MUNNI DEVI v. LEARNED ADDL. COMMISSIONER, DEVI PATAN MANDAL, GONDA AND OTHERS

A227/6421/2025 · 2025-11-04

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6421 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to respondent no. 2, is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the respondent no.1 to decide the application for impleadment filed in Revision No. 1199/2024 computerized No. C20240800001199 "Vishwanath Singh Vs. Mohd. Shahid", under Section 219 U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, pending since 18.06.2025 before Additional Commissioner Devipatan Mandal Gonda, Expeditiously within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court as contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition. 4. It has been submitted that respondent no.2 instituted a revision under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, before the court below against the order dated 23.07.2024 passed by Tehsildar, Colonelganj, Gonda, under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, in which the petitioner have moved an application for impleadment and the same is still pending before the court below since 18.06.2025. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nagendra Pratap Singh, Harsh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Tara Devi @ Munni Devi .....Petitioner(s) Learned Addl. Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2025 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the impleadment application, which has been filed only in 2025. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 6. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the impleadment application of the petitioner expeditiously. 7. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6421 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench