Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175754 (MAD)

G.KOVIL PICHAI v. The State Represented by Inspector of Police

CRL OP/34001/2025 · 2025-12-15

A D Jagadish Chandira

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.34001 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.12.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.34001 of 2025 G.Kovil Pichai ...Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, Inspector of Police, Steel Plant Police Station, Salem City. ...Respondent Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order in revision petition in C.R.P.No.44 of 2023 dated 09.12.2024, on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Salem, confirming the order passed in Crl.MP.No.3749 of 2023 dated 15.11.203 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Salem and consequently order for return of cash to the tune of Rs.8,00,000/- and the Samsung Black Color Mobile Phone carrying AIRTEL Sim No.98656 15313 to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Himavanth For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh, GA (Crl. Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.34001 of 2025 O R D E R The present criminal original petition has been filed to quash the order dated 09.12.2024 passed in C.R.P.No.44 of 2023 on the file of the learned III Additional District Judge, Salem, confirming the order dated 15.11.2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Salem in Crl.MP.No.3749 of 2023. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that this petition cannot be entertained, since it would amount to second revision, which is barred under Section 397(3) of Cr.P.C. He also submitted that the revisional court had dismissed the revision filed by the petitioner, confirming the findings of the trial court on the ground that the investigation is not completed. However, subsequently, investigation has been completed and a final report has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Salem in C.C.No.1883 of 2025. 3. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this criminal original petition with liberty to file a fresh application before the trial court seeking return of case 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.34001 of 2025 properties. An endorsement to the said effect was also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in this petition today. 4. In view of the above, this criminal original petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application before the court concerned seeking return of properties. 15.12.2025 skt Neutral Citation: Yes/No To 1. The III Additional District Judge, Salem. 2. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Salem. 3. The Inspector of Police, Steel Plant Police Station, Salem City. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.34001 of 2025 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J. skt Crl.O.P.No.34001 of 2025 15.12.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis