SUMIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/11307/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175749 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175749 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11307 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for he State, Shri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 264 of 2025, under sections 87, 137(2), 351(2), 64(2)(M) BNS, Sections 5(L)(J))(ii)/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Jahangirabad, District Barabanki.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that applicant had enticed the daughter of the informant and had taken her to Bangalore and on the false pretext of marriage physical relation were formed because of which she became pregnant. The tentative age of the victim is around 18 years. Both the counsels says that the parties are ready and willing to solemnise the marriage.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances and the aforesaid statement, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 7.9.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Sumit be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suhail Kashif Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sumit .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 20, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11307 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench