Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175734 (ALL)

KAYYUM ALI @ KAYYUBALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/12017/2025 · 2025-12-04

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12017 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Ram Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.391 of 2025, under Section 64(1), 115(2), 351(3) BNS & Section 4(2) of POCSO Act, P.S. Sandhana, District Sitapur. 3. In terms of the FIR allegations were levelled that the informant had gone out of home for answering the call of nature when the applicant committed wrong on her and when she went back and informed her husband, he was also beaten up. In the statements under Section 180 & 183 BNSS, similar averments were made. Medical on record does not corroborate the allegation. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the victim is aged about 19 years and married and the medical does not corroborate the allegation, the applicant who is in custody since 24.10.2025 amd has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Kayyum Ali @ Kayyubali be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kayyum Ali @ Kayyubali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 4, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12017 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench