OM PRAKASH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/10212/2025 · 2025-11-06
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175725 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175725 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10212 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.291 of 2025, under Sections 105, 125(A), 125(B) of BNS, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Gonda.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the son of the informant was sitting in front of a shop when the applicant was driving vehicle rashly and negligently which resulted into the death of his son. Initially, the FIR was lodged under Section 105 of BNS.
4. The Counsel for the applicant states that it was a case of Section 106 of BNS and not under Section 105 of BNS.
5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
6. Considering the fact that prima faice, the allegations in the FIR were with regard to the causing an accident and the fact that the applicant who has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 29.06.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Om Prakash Yadav be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : D.P. Dutt Tiwari, Vishvajeet Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Om Prakash Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 6, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10212 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench