HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1227 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.122 of 2023 under Sections 419/467/468/471 of I.P.C. registered at Police Station- Kotwali Nanpara, District- Bahraich. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 12.03.2023 against five persons, including the applicant, stating that the complainant had purchased a land in the year 1956. A long litigation continued regarding the property dispute between the complainant and the applicant Uday Veer, Krishna Kumar and Santosh Kumar, who lost the case finally in the year 2018. In the year 2020, the aforesaid accused persons executed a power of attorney in favour of Furkan on the basis whereof Furkan filed a case in the Board of Revenue, Prayagraj in the year 2021. The accused persons forged a compromise deed containing forged signatures of the complainant also. 4. After investigation, initially the Investigating Officer has submitted a closure report but a protest application filed by the complainant was accepted and further investigation was conducted which is still pending. The co-accused Furkan has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ratnesh Singh, Pranav Mishra, Rahul Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Uday Veer .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 25.9.2025 passed in Anticipatory Bail No.1077 of 2025. 7. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application and submitted that further investigation in the present case is still going on. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that even as per the FIR version, some litigation of civil nature is pending between the complainant and other three accused persons who have executed the power of attorney in favour of the applicant; the genuineness of the documents is already a question that is subjudice which is pending between the parties and that after initial investigation, a closure report has been submitted by the Investigating Officer, bail order of co-accused Furkan, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. 9. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court : (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v) that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. November 6, 2025 kkb/ ABAIL No. 1227 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench