Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175676 (ALL)

VINEET v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO

BAIL/1996/2025 · 2025-11-04

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1996 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Harsh Pratap Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ajeet Kumar Singh as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.415 of 2024 under Sections 3(5), 105, 115(2), 352 BNS, P.S.- Sandila, District- Hardoi. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that only general allegations have been leveled on account of a property dispute amongst the parties. It was alleged that on the date of incident, a pity dispute had arrived at amongst the parties, in which, accused, four in number, caused injuries, which resulted in the death of the victim. It is argued that two co-accused persons, having similar role, have already been granted bail. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and bail orders of the co- accused, nature of allegations, coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 24.12.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Vineet be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajat Pratap Singh, Askari Husain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ajeet Kumar Singh Vineet .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 4, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 1996 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench