KARAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/9770/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175659 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175659 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9770 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 44 of 2025, under sections 103(1), 238 BNS, P.S. Unchauliya, District Kheri.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that son of informant was found dead. No one was named in the FIR. Subsequently based upon confessional statement and the statement of the informant that the deceased was close to the applicant the applicant has been linked with the offence in question. The recovery of the victim at the instance of the applicant is not in presence of independent witness and the co accused has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 16.5.2025.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the nature of evidence linking the applicant with the offence in question to be prima facie weak coupled with the fact the co accused have been enlarged on bail, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 18.2.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Karan Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Karan Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 26, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9770 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench