AKHILESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/13898/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175642 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175642 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13898 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite party No.1 and Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party Nos.2 & 3.
2. In view of the order being passed, issuance of notice to opposite party No.4 stands dispensed with.
3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the authority concerned to consider for payment of salary alongwith arrears on the post of Assistant Teacher and for regular salary.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, Ambedkar Nagar, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of.
December 2, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Madhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Akhilesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench