- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10127-DB WP No. 5557 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 5557 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M G RAJU @ RAJANNA S/O GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. SRI. RAVI S/O D.GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SRI. RANGASHAMAIAH S/O D.GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT MAVINAKUNTE VILLAGE, THYAMGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 132. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA A S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10127-DB WP No. 5557 of 2025 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, OFFICE AT NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVANA, RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO 39, ARAVINDA BHAVANA, BENGALURU 560 001. 4. SMT. GOWRAMMA @ MANGALA GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, D/O LATE DODDAIAH, W/O LATE GOVINDAIAH, R/A NO. 444/A, NEW NO. 124, SRINIVASA NILAYA, GOVT SCHOOL ROAD, 1ST CROSS, MARATHAHALLI, BENGALURU 560026. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA VIKRAM BHAT, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-B ORDER DATED 23.01.2025, PASSED BY THE SINGLE BENCH OF THIS COURT; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10127-DB WP No. 5557 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the petitioners has moved a memo dated 27.02.2025, seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo reads as under: "I, the Advocate for petitioner in the above case is hereby withdrawing this petition to file a appeal as it was a typographical error to file this petition, which has to be appeal, hence I withdraw this petition, in the interest of justice." 3. In view of the above, the petition is accordingly disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE RD