ANIL KUMAR @ GALLU (IN FIR ANIL MISHRA ) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO
BAIL/8959/2025 · 2025-11-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175630 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175630 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8959 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Vijay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 102 of 2025 under sections 105 BNS, P.S. Itiyathok, District Gonda.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused Sachin Mishra with similar allegations has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 28.8.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 8116 of 2025.
4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and adopting the same reasoning, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 12.5.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Anil Kumar @ Gallu (in FIR Anil Mishra) be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Veerendra Kumar Anil Kumar @ Gallu (In Fir Anil Mishra ) .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8959 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench