RAMDAYAL SINGH ALIAS KARAMDAYAL SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./1964/2025 · 2025-08-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17563 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17563 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:26201] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.1964 of 2025
------ Ramdayal Singh @ Karamdayal Singh aged about 27 years S/o Jagtaran Singh resident of village Badka Regre, P.O. Lapa, P.S. Jariyagarh, District Khunti
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kr. Ganjhu, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-29-08-2025
Heard the parties.
This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of B.A. No.3812 of 2025 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 09.05.2025 passed by this Court.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that B.A. No.3812 of 2025 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 09.05.2025 passed by this Court to file a supplementary affidavit mentioning therein the offences involved in Jariyagarh P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025 and Kamdara P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025 in which the petitioner has been in custody along with the supporting documents. It is next submitted that due to non- availability of the Pairvikar, the said peremptory order could not be complied with within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said B.A. No.3812 of 2025 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 09.05.2025 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 09.05.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said B.A. No.3812 of 2025 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the B.A. No.3812 of 2025 be restored to its original file.
Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, B.A. No.3812 of 2025 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list B.A. No.3812 of 2025 before the concerned Bench after a week.
This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/