HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9863 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to set aside the impugned order dated 25.7.2025 passed in Session Trial No.390 of 2017 (State vs. Rajesh Kumar Singh) case crime no.505 of 2015, under section 302 IPC., Police Station Musafirkhana, District Amethi passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge/Special Judge (EC Ac) Court no. 4 Sultanpur, rejecting the application under section 227 Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant as well as charge sheet dated 11.11.2016 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur and also to stay proceedings of S.T. No.1660 of 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The number of villagers had given application to the police authorities that applicant was innocent but the same was not considered and charge sheet was submitted. Thereafter, discharge application was also filed, which was also rejected without considering the entire material collected by the Investigating Officer therefore, kind indulgence of this court is necessary. 4. Learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer of the applicant and submitted that applicant is a named accused in the FIR of the case in question and the eye witness has also supported the prosecution story therefore, there is no illegality in the order passed by the learned court below. 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, going through the contents of the petition as well as other relevant material, as the applicant is named in the FIR and the witnesses have supported the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lakshmana Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajesh Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) prosecution version in the case diary, therefore, no interference is required. 6. Accordingly, the application is misconceived and is, hereby, dismissed. 7. The observations made by this court will not affect the trial of the proceeding. December 15, 2025 Pks A482 No. 9863 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench