Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175583 (ALL)

NETRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/11429/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11429 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.129 of 2025 under sections 64, 333, 115(2) BNS, and section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Naimisharanya, District Sitapur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the informant Mamta, wife of Deen Dayal, was having a dispute with the applicant and when they are not at home, the applicant came and caught hold of the daughter of the informant and she was pushed by the applicant. No allegation of rape were levelled, however, in the statement under section 180 BNSS, the victim stated that on 25.08.2025, wrong was also committed on her. A similar statement was given under section 183 BNSS. The medical on record did not corroborate the allegations. 4. Considering the huge difference in the FIR allegation and the two statements and the same not being corroborated by the medical, the applicant who is in custody since 29.08.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Netram be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shyam Narayan, Manas Gaurav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Netram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11429 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench