HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1728 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Anand Pal Singh Vishen, Advocate on behalf of the complainant is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State and perused the record. 3. The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No. 521 of 2024, under sections 419, 420, 506 I.P.C, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda. 4. Upon objection being raised by learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned A.G.A for the State, learned counsel for applicant submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 5. In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Adarsh Singh, Somnath Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Kuber .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Office is directed to return original/certified copy of the documents to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining its photocopy on record. November 18, 2025 DiVYa NABAIL No. 1728 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench