C.M.P.No.2485 of 2025 in C.M.A(Sr).No.9422 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J. Though notice served on 3rd respondent and his name appears in the list, there is no representation. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2. 3. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned. 3. Registry is directed to print the name of M/s.T.Dhanasekaran, learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 at the time of admission. nr 07.03.2025 Note:Registry is directed to number the CMA and list it for admission, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis