HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1074 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Meva Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset has submitted that petitioner has efficacious alternate remedy of filing revision before the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar under Section 48(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, against impugned order dated 13.06.2025, passed by the Settlement Officer (Consolidation), Ambedkar Nagar, hence he does not want to press the following writ petition. 3. In the light of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to petitioner to file revision before the Deputy Director of Consolidation, under Section 48(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. November 25, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Meva Lal Yadav, Harshita Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Chandra Jeet .....Petitioner(s) Settlement Officer Of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench