ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION/S.C.B. LKO. THRU. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/10461/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175560 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175560 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10461 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. The applicant has filed the instant applicant mainly with the following prayers:
1. to quash and setting-aside the Impugned Order Dated- 01.12.2025 Passed by The Judicial Magistrate, Pollution, Special C.B.I., Lucknow, in Case No. 01A/2009, RC 4(S)/2007, Under Section-120B r/w- 420,467,468 & 471 I.P.C.,C.B.I./S.C.B. Lucknow, C.B.I. Versus Anil Kumar Srivastava, which is pending in the Special Judicial Magistrate, Pollution, C.B.I., Lucknow. ii. to Inspect the case dairy, F.I.R., Charge-Sheet and important document in Case No. 01A/2009, RC 4(S)/2007, Under Section-120B r/w- 420,467,468 & 471 I.P.C., C.B.I./S.C.B. Lucknow, C.B.I.-Versus Anil Kumar Srivastava, which is pending in the Special Judicial Magistrate, Pollution, Lucknow, in the interest of justice. C.B.I.,
iii. stay the proceedings of Case No. 01A/2009, RC 4 (S)/2007, C.B.I./S.C.B. Lucknow, Under Section- 120-B r/w 420, 467, 468 & 471 IPC, pending In The Court of Special Judicial Magistrate, Pollution/C.B.I., Lucknow, C.B.I. till the Versus Anil Kumar Srivastava final disposal of the instant application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Karuna Shanker Rastogi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anurag Kumar Singh, G.A. Anil Kumar Srivastava .....Applicant(s) Central Bureau Of Investigation/S.C.B. Lko. Thru. Superintendent Of Police Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is ready to argue the case before the court below, however, be may be permitted to inspect the case dairy, F.I.R., Charge-Sheet and important document in Case No. 01A/2009. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the case is fixed for 19.12.2025, however, due to some personal reasons, he is ready to argue the case finally on 22.12.2025. Sri Anurag Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent, on the basis of instructions, has stated that the learned counsel for the applicant may peruse the F.I.R., chargesheet and statements of the witnesses. In view of the above, nothing survives to be decided in this case. Learned counsel for the applicant will be allowed to inspect the case diary, F.I.R. and chargesheet on or before 22.12.2025. It is made clear that the learned counsel for the applicant will not seek adjournment in the case and argue the case finally on 22.12.2025, as stated before this court, and the court below will take decision in accordance with law, without giving further adjournment. With the above observations/directions this application is disposed of.
December 16, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 10461 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench