KRISHNA KISHOR YADAV AND 7 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDU. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/13779/2025 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175551 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175551 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13779 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned State counsel for opposite parties no.1 & 2, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.3 and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties no.4 & 5. 2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the matter is being decided finally. 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have been given the officiating charge of the post of Headmaster yet are not being paid salary of the said post. 4. Contention is that this aspect of the matter has already been considered by the Division Bench of this Court in a bunch of appeals leading being Special Appeal No. 652 of 2024 Inre; Secretary, UP Basic Education Board and Ors Vs. Tripurari Dubey and Ors- 2025: AHC:67382-DB which judgment in turn has been affirmed with the dismissal of the Special Leave to Appeal vide order dated 13.08.2025 in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 22427 of 2025. 5. Further contention is that the respondents be directed to consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Tripurari Dubey (supra). Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek, Utkarsh Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh, Uday Veer Singh Krishna Kishor Yadav And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Edu. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting respondents do not dispute the aforesaid question of law as decided by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Tripurari Dubey (supra). 7. Considering the aforesaid, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no. 3 to consider the claim of the petitioners for being given the salary to the post of Headmaster- In charge in accordance with law and the relevant rules as well as the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Tripurari Dubey (supra) which consideration would be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
November 28, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 13779 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench