Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010179572025 2025:GAU-AS:10995 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2632/2025 MANOJ BARMAN S/O- LATE KALICHARAN NATH, R/O- CIRCUIT HOUSE ROAD, P.O. AND P.S- DIBRUGARH, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, THE REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT (REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM 3:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DIBRUGARH WEST REVENUE CIRCLE DIBRUGARH ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D GOGOI, Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/1013/2025 MANOJ BARMAN S/O- LATE KALICHARAN NATH R/O- CIRCUIT HOUSE ROAD P.O. AND P.S- DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND THREE ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM THE REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT (REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM 3:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DIBRUGARH WEST REVENUE CIRCLE DIBRUGARH ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR PARAM HANGKHA KONWAR Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND THREE ORS BEFORE Page No.# 3/3 THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY O R D E R 19.08.2025 1. Heard Mr. D Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. PR Mahanta, learned standing counsel for the Revenue and Disaster Management Department. 2. The connected writ petition being WP(C) 1013/2025 was disposed of by this court under its order dated 24.06.2025. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the cause title of the writ petition, the name of the father of the petitioner was wrongly typed as Late Kalicharan Nath instead of Late Kalicharan Barman and accordingly when the certified copy of the aforesaid order dated 24.06.2025 was obtained, in the certified copy, the name of the father of the petitioner has also reflected to be Late Kalicharan Nath instead of Late Kalicharan Barman. 4. Considering the inadvertent mistake, this court is of the opinion that the petitioner be allowed to furnish a fresh corrected memo of parties before the Registry in the connected disposed of writ petition i.e. WP(C) 1013/2025 so that, in the certified copy, that may be obtained after the correction, the name of the father of the petitioner is duly and correctly reflected. 5. With the aforesaid, the present IA stands disposed of. 6. Registry to do the needful on submission of a fresh memo of parties by the petitioner. JUDGE Comparing Assistant