Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175503 (ALL)

ASHRAF KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME AND 7 OTHERS

/6723/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6723 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned State Counsel and perused the record. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred with the following main prayer:- " Issue an order or direction directing the Learned Additional Civil Judge (C.D), Room No. 14, Pratapgarh to decide/conclude the application filed under Order 20, Rule 18(2) of C.P.C bearing Misc. Case No. 35 of 2018, Abdul Mannan Khan and others Vs. Sajida Khatoon and others, within stipulated time" 3. On being asked whether any urgency application for early disposal of the application has been preferred before the trial court, indicating urgency in the matter, learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that no such urgency application for early disposal of the application filed under Order 20, Rule 18(2) C.P.C bearing Misc. Case No. 35 of 2018, has been preferred by the petitioner. He prays that the present writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the application and the learned trial court may be directed to decide the same within the stipulated time as this Court may fix. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application indicating urgency for early disposal of the application filed under Order 20, Rule 18(2) C.P.C bearing Misc. Case No. 35 of 2018, Abdul Mannan Khan and others versus Sajida Khatoon and others. If any such application is preferred alongwith certified Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Javed Khan, Juned Khan, Parvez Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ashraf Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) copy of this order, it is expected that the trial court shall decide the urgency application expeditiously, in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. November 24, 2025 DiVYa A227 No. 6723 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench