VINOD KUMAR SINGH and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION and ORS.
WRIA/10091/2021 · 2025-11-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175485 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175485 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10091 of 2021 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 27, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vinod Kumar Singh And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Secy. Secondary Education And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench