Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17546 (JHR)

VIKRAM KUMAR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5448/2025 · 2025-07-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:18133] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5448 of 2025 ------ Vikram Kumar Mandal, aged about 21 years, son of Nimay Chandra Mandal, Resident of Village Niyamatchak, P.O. and P.S. Thakur Gangti, District- Godda. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-07-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No.77 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 69, 89, 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner had sexual intercourse with the informant by applying deceitful means of promising to marry with her and caused miscarriage of her child without her consent and committed theft of one mobile phone along with Rs.15,000/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that this is a case of consensual sexual relationship between two adult persons. It is then submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.04.2025 as is evident from para-17 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Godda in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No.77 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/