Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010178852024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/109/2025 HEMENDRA NATH THAKUR S/O LATE UPENDRA NATH THAKUR, RESIDENT OF RUKMINIGAON, NEAR TANGRA SATRA, KHANAPARA GUWAHATI , KAMRUP M ASSAM 781022 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 06. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF INLAND WATER TRANSPORT ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI 7 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 4:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHAKRABORTY, MRS P HAZARIKA,MS. RIA TIWARI Advocate for the Respondent : , SC, IWT,SC, FINANCE,SC, AG (A AND E) Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/3146/2024 HEMENDRA NATH THAKUR S/O LATE UPENDRA NATH THAKUR RESIDENT OF RUKMINIGAON NEAR TANGRA SATRA KHANAPARA GUWAHATI KAMRUP M ASSAM 781022 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 2:THE DIRECTOR OF INLAND WATER TRANSPORT ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI 7 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 4:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM ------------ For petitioner/appellant(s) : Mr. B. Chakraborty, Advocate For respondent(s) : Ms. M.D. Borah, SC, Transport Mr. P. Nayak, SC, Finance, Mr. B. Chakravarty, Advocate Page No.# 3/3 – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI 09.05.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we are of the view that the matter requires consideration. Hence, admit. Ms. M.D. Borah, learned Standing counsel, Transport Department, Assam, has put in appearance and accepted notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2; Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing counsel, Finance Department, Assam, has accepted notice on behalf of respondent No. 3; while Mr. B. Chakravarty, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent No. 4. Service of notice upon the respondents is, therefore, complete. Copy of the writ petition along with the documents annexed to the writ petition be supplied to the learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents, if not already supplied. List for hearing in due course. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant