Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175458 (ALL)

DINESH SINGH TOMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/715/2025 · 2025-12-03

Manjive Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 715 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State. 2. The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief:- "i. Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned judgment and order dated 03.10.2024 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hardoi in Criminal Revision No.117/2024, Dinesh Singh Tomar vs. State of U.P. and another and summoning order dated 19.05.2023 passed by Civil Judge (S.D.)/F.T.C. Hardoi and also Non-Bailable Warrant dated 12.11.2024 issued by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Hardoi, in Complaint Case No.2080 of 2022, Sandhya Singh Vs. Dinesh Singh and others, under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 I.P.C and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Atrauli, District-Hardoi along with entire criminal proceeding of the aforesaid case pending before the concerned court as contained in Annexure No.1, 2 and 3 to this petition in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant, at the very outset, has submitted that the appellant shall surrender before the trial court and shall file the application for grant of bail. He has further submitted that this Court may direct the trial court to consider and decide the appellant's Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Irfan Khan, Abdur Rub, Shabe Roshan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ajai Kumar Singh, Shobhit Singh Dinesh Singh Tomar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) application for bail in the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State does not have any objection if the aforesaid limited prayer is allowed in favour of the appellant. 5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this criminal appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to surrender before the trial court concerned and file the application for bail within a period of four weeks from today and if such application is filed, the trial court is hereby directed to consider and decide the said application, expeditiously keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). It is further provided that for the period of four weeks, no coercive measures shall be taken against the appellant. December 3, 2025 akhilesh/- A482 No. 715 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench