RAMESHWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LAW AFFAIRS LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/13737/2025 · 2025-11-27
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175454 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175454 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13737 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties and Mr.Shishir Jain, learned counsel for opposite party No.2.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the authority concerned for payment of Family Pension to petitioner w.e.f. 10.04.2020 as she was fully dependent upon her mother/Smt. Phoolmati who expired in service on 098.04.2020.
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. District Judge (Administrative), District Raebareli, who shall consider and decide the same, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the heirs of deceased, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 27, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohit Sharma, Pooja Mishra, Somender Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rameshwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Law Affairs Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench