Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17545 (GAU)

PRADIP KUMAR AGARWALLA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/4704/2023 · 2025-03-02

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010179432023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4704/2023 PRADIP KUMAR AGARWALLA SON OF LATE SURAJMAL AGARWALLA, RESIDENT OF 202, MAHABIR APARTMENT, USHA GALI, A.T.ROAD, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3 4:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SOUTHERN ASSAM (W.R) CIRCLE CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3 5:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT MANGALDAI W.R. DIVISION MANGALDA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D K JAIN, Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, WATER RESOURCE, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE O R D E R Date : 03.03.2025 . Heard Mr. D.K. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. C. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Assam, for the respondent Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 and Mr. S.R. Baruah, learned State Counsel for the respondent No.1. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction to the respondent authorities for payment of an admitted amount of Rs.6,46,294/- (Rupees six lakh forty six thousand two hundred ninety four) only, for the works executed by the petitioner under the flood management programme and anti- erosion measures. The case of the petitioner is that he is a contractor by profession and being the Government Registered Contractor, he executes different contract and supply works under the Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Mangaldoi since last two years under different schemes of the Government of Assam. Pursuant to the tender, the petitioner was awarded the works of: (1) R/S of Bornadi L/B embkt from Patgirichuba to R.K. embkt (ch 0m to 20000m) under FMP and (2) Anti-erosion measures in B/B of river Mangaldoi to protect Mangaldoi town and its adjoining areas, vide orders dated 30.10.2015 and Page No.# 3/4 19.11.2016. Mr. D.K. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has executed the work as awarded by the respondent authorities. Thereafter, he submitted the bill amounting to Rs.14,82,464/- (Rupees fourteen lakh eighty two thousand four hundred sixty four) only, out of which part payment has been made. He submits that an amount of Rs.6,46,294/- (Rupees six lakh forty six thousand two hundred ninety four) only has not been paid despite repeated request to the respondent authorities. He submits that the amount claimed by the petitioner is an admitted one and there is no dispute regarding execution of works. The respondents have clearly admitted the said outstanding amount, which is reflected from the statement showing the liabilities, issued by the Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Mangaldoi. Therefore, he prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to pay the aforesaid admitted amount to the petitioner. Mr. C. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Water Resources Department submits that out of the total bill amount of Rs.14,82,464/- (Rupees fourteen lakh eighty two thousand four hundred sixty four) only, part payment of Rs.8,36,170/- (Rupees eight lakh thirty six thousand one hundred seventy) only has been made to the petitioner and admittedly an outstanding liability of Rs.6,46,294/- (Rupees six lakh forty six thousand two hundred ninety four) only, as claimed by the petitioner is yet to be paid due to non-availability of fund at present. Referring to the affidavit in opposition filed by the respondent No.3, the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Mr. Sarma, learned standing Page No.# 4/4 counsel submits that the authorities have assures that the pending liability would be settled immediately when the funds for the aforesaid scheme is received from the Central Government, as the same is being actively pursued by taking all necessary steps for release of the fund. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and considering that the petitioner has executed the aforesaid works and has submitted the bill as per the work orders and part payment of Rs.8,36,170/- (Rupees eight lakh thirty six thousand one hundred seventy) only has been made to the petitioner as well as considering the assurance by the respondents that the outstanding liability would be settled immediately, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to verify and if admitted, the same be paid to the petitioner. Accordingly, it is directed that the respondent authorities in the Water Resources Department shall verify the claim of the petitioner and if found admitted, shall release the aforesaid outstanding amount of Rs.6,46,294/- (Rupees six lakh forty six thousand two hundred ninety four) only, to the petitioner within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. The writ petition stands allowed and disposed of in terms above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant