ANUPAM VIJAY GUPTA ALIAS ANUPAM VIJAY v. VIRENDRA KUMAR
A227/1403/2025 · 2025-02-13
Ajit Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17545 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17545 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20259 Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1403 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anupam Vijay Gupta Alias Anupam Vijay Respondent :- Virendra Kumar Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Agrawal Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard Sri Ashish Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. By means of this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, petitioner wants expeditious disposal of S.C.C. Suit No. 9 of 2018, Anupam Vijay Gupta alias Anupam Vijay v. Virendra Kumar pending in the court of Judge, Small Causes Court/ Additional Session Judge, F.T.C. - II, Bijnor. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after exchange of pleadings between the parties the case is at the stage of recording of evidence of the parties. In the circumstances, the Court considers it appropriate to expedite the proceedings of the aforesaid case and accordingly, following directions are issued: (i). Plaintiff shall be concluded her evidence in all circumstances within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and the court shall ensure that defendant cooperates in the conclusion of the evidence of plaintiff; (ii). After plaintiff's evidence is concluded, the defendant respondent shall conclude his evidence within a further period of two months and plaintiff shall cooperate in the conclusion of defendant's evidence; and (iii). After evidence of respective parties stands concluded, the court shall proceed to finally hear and decide the suit within a maximum period of two months without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and if any adjournment is granted for unavoidable circumstances, the reasons must be recorded in the order sheet. However, it is clarified that for any justifiable reasons or unavoidable circumstances, the suit proceedings are not concluded
within the specified period of time as directed herein above, such delay will itself ordinarily not bind the judicial officer personally liable for contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 13.2.2025 IrfanUddin Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad