[2025:RJ-JP:25505] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5800/2025 Vijay Singh S/o Mukesh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Mui, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. (Presently Confined At District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Jogi Mr. Aditya Mishra Mr. Ishan Mishra Ms. Rashmi Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Judgment 10/07/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.53/2025 registered at Police Station Rawanjana Doongar, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 318 (4), 336(3) and 338 of BNS, Sections 66(C), 66(D) of I.T Act and Section 13 of R.P.G.O. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Charge-sheet has already been filed. Petitioner is in custody since long and conclusion of the trial will take considerable time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:25505] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5800/2025] 4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the present case, and perused the record as also arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties, since petitioner is in custody since long, conclusion of trial will take time, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Vijay Singh S/o Mukesh is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Looking to the nature of offence, it is made clear that if the petitioner is found involved in offences of similar nature in future, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the benefit of bail granted to the accused-petitioner by this Court. ( CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J Diksha/170