SATYA PRAKASH MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
/11080/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11080 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. In view of the proposed order, notices to the respondents No. 4 to 13 are hereby dispensed with.
3. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally at the admission stage.
4. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for the following main relief(s):-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus for independent inquiry into the custodial assault and illegal act committed by police person with further direction to initiate departmental and criminal proceedings against him."
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length states that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to approach the competent authority i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, District- Ayodhya for the redressal of his grievances. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rama Niwas Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Satya Prakash Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
7. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner approaches the competent authority, then the competent authority shall consider the grievance of the petitioner and shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
8. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.
9. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. November 24, 2025 (Manoj K.) CRLP No. 11080 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench