NEESHU YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/1287/2025 · 2025-11-06
Rajiv Gupta, Tej Pratap Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175420 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175420 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1287 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
1. Despite mention being made by the petitioners, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the instant petition.
2. Per contra, learned AGA states that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioners and as such, this petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. In view of the submission made, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 6, 2025 NSC Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Pandey, Aman Agarwal, Sandhya Bharti Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Neeshu Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NARENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench