RAM MURTI v. BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LUCKNOW THRU. CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS
A227/6582/2025 · 2025-11-12
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175404 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175404 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6582 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi for the State respondent while Sri Mohan Singh has accepted notice on behalf of respondent No.3.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No.1 - Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide Revision No.623 of 2023 (computerized case No.R-2023042300623) "Ram Murti Vs. Durgesh" filed under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Revision No.623 of 2023 (computerized case No.R-2023042300623) "Ram Murti Vs. Durgesh" filed under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 12, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushmita Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Ram Murti .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench